2475 Shares

Is there consensus among *climate* scientists that global warming is anthropomorphic? If so, who are they?

Is there consensus among *climate* scientists that global warming is anthropomorphic? If so, who are they? Topic: Science research articles
June 17, 2019 / By Lakisha
Question: You always hear about "growing scientific consensus", but no statistics are ever given and that phrase is never defined. I mean anthropogenic. Sorry! candy2mercy- I would accept that, but the article from Science says "That hypothesis was tested by analyzing 928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and listed in the ISI database with the keywords "climate change". That's 93 papers per year, 75 percent of which agree with anthropogenic warming. That's a lot, but are we positive that these papers aren't produced by the same research groups? And if the perceived causes for global warming weren't anthropogenic, would these journals be as eager to publish articles about climate change? I want to put 100 of the most reputable climate scientists in an auditorium, and find out how many would agree with anthropogenic climate change.
Best Answer

Best Answers: Is there consensus among *climate* scientists that global warming is anthropomorphic? If so, who are they?

Jennica Jennica | 1 day ago
I found these two articles, they don't really give the exact specifics your asking for but it gives you an idea of the kind of people who are in agreement to the anthropomorphism of global warming. (I've always wanted to use that word). The more recent article cites the head of the National Academy for Sciences, an independent research institution set up by congress to advise the government. I think you'd be hard pressed to say a consensus on this topic, it certainly isn't as cut and dry as other scientific theories. I think that you could reach a consensus on two things. 1)The earth is hotter getting warmer, warmer than it's been in many centuries. 2) Human beings produce a large amount of greenhouse gases, mostly in the form of carbon. I'm not a geologist by any means, but it's a mighty big coincidence that the industrial age coincides with a massive climate change. There is no doubt the climate is changing, even if we aren't at "fault" our emissions aren't helping, this alone is enough reason for me to care about the issue.
👍 210 | 👎 1
Did you like the answer? Is there consensus among *climate* scientists that global warming is anthropomorphic? If so, who are they? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Science research articles


Jennica Originally Answered: Is there consensus among *climate* scientists that global warming is anthropomorphic? If so, who are they?
I found these two articles, they don't really give the exact specifics your asking for but it gives you an idea of the kind of people who are in agreement to the anthropomorphism of global warming. (I've always wanted to use that word). The more recent article cites the head of the National Academy for Sciences, an independent research institution set up by congress to advise the government. I think you'd be hard pressed to say a consensus on this topic, it certainly isn't as cut and dry as other scientific theories. I think that you could reach a consensus on two things. 1)The earth is hotter getting warmer, warmer than it's been in many centuries. 2) Human beings produce a large amount of greenhouse gases, mostly in the form of carbon. I'm not a geologist by any means, but it's a mighty big coincidence that the industrial age coincides with a massive climate change. There is no doubt the climate is changing, even if we aren't at "fault" our emissions aren't helping, this alone is enough reason for me to care about the issue.

Fiona Fiona
Only a small minority of scientists discount the role that humanity's actions have played in recent warming. However, the uncertainty is more significant regarding how much climate change should be expected in the future, and there is a hotly contested political and public debate over what, if anything, should be done to reduce or reverse future warming, and how to cope with the predicted consequences.
👍 90 | 👎 -5

Cyrilla Cyrilla
You are missing a factor...Money! Scientists and indeed many scholars are motivated to see what is politically correct to see for their own tenure. Why does Mr. Bush avoid or deny tough environmental issues...could it be that his family has been in the oil business for years? If indeed the climate is changing because of man, then why no action to prevent it? It would be bad business. Scientists in Australia even suggested that cows were responsible from their stomach gases causing methane pollution of the atmosphere. It would appear that they are working for an oil company or the owners thereof. There is much proof that things are changing, glaciers melting, etc but is it cyclical or anthropomorphic? Even that remains in debate.
👍 90 | 👎 -11

Bijou Bijou
Here's the article showing that of almost 1,000 peer-reviewed climate change articles in scientific journals all of them agreed that climate change is real, and a problem. Major reports also agree that it is anthropogenic.
👍 90 | 👎 -17

Ailith Ailith
Efforts are still made only to prevent Global Warming. We assume Global Warming also, to be a natural phenomenon and we have already crossed our limits in preventing it. Being Research Engineers we have made an attempt to suggest a solution to this so called Global Warming in the form of futuresystematization. Visit www.geocities.com/futuresystematization for my survey on "Global Warming an approach to human survival"
👍 90 | 👎 -23

Ailith Originally Answered: PLEASE help me with paper on GLOBAL WARMING PLEASE?
First off, I think it would be a good idea for people to state also their career, education status (or even what their degree was or is in). Maybe you'll make connections with what people say and whay they do. I know global warming exists. It's is a natural process of the earth to cool and warm. HOWEVER, I am not saying that the movie "the day after tomorow" or any holywood movie is any where close to accurate about what global warming is. People are so concerned about the politics of it all: Liberal=believe in global warming and Conservatives=believe it's a lie from the liberal media. Honestly, the ice caps are melting, and they will raise the sea level, which will cause flooding. Now the real issue isn't that our world is going to end. The pollution we are emitting and waste we are dumping is killing our planet. The rainforests will be gone in 2030, and marine life is expected to be gone in 2050 by scientists. My story with global warming: I snorkled a lot of the coral reefs in Australia's Great Barrier Reef. Coral is usually colorful except when it dies from various things. Coral is dying in masses from the raise in temperature and sea level-this is called coral bleaching. When the coral dies so does the life that surrounds the coral. Surely soon sea life will become extinct, but bleaching is only one of the causes out of many.

If you have your own answer to the question science research articles, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.