Penis is facing straight down?

Penis is facing straight down? Topic: Tissue case sewing
June 25, 2019 / By Millesant
Question: So my penis like faces down when i get an erection, it just kinda curves a little from where it connects to my body and then just like starts facing down fully from there basically, ive been masturbating since i was in middle school, and i remember my penis used to face straight up back then, but i cant remember quite if it just started slowly beding down over time, or how it went, but anyways, now its like this, i hear its from masturbating to much? And ive basically just masturbated about 1 time a day for the last 3 or 4 years... I dont know if this is normal?
Best Answer

Best Answers: Penis is facing straight down?

Lilac Lilac | 5 days ago
Penile curvature is a congenital occurrence. Some have trivial or nonsignificant sideway (sometimes downward) deviation of the penis, which is still considered normal, since the curvature does not interfere with normal copulation. There are unfortunate males who have a downward curvature, and sometimes the degree of curvature can be so bad that it hinders them from normal copulation (a condition called chordee). There have been several theories as to why this happens (one of them being the shorter side - which is the ventral side - of the penis has a deficiency of testosterone receptors that's why penile tissue didn't grow as well as the longer side did) and there have been 4 mechanisms identified (see link below) to this occurrence. I do not know how old you are. I'm assuming you're not done with puberty yet, so you still have ways to go with your secondary sexual development. It is worth-while, though, to consult a urologist, as you may have chordee. The treatment options to this (especially for the badly-curved cases) is surgery. One is doing what's called a Nesbit procedure (which is resecting wedge-sections from the dorsal or longer side of the penis, and sewing the edges together so that the penis is straighter, though this has been associated with some - perhaps minimal - penile shortening), or make the shorter (or ventral) side longer with grafts (which, although does not shorten the penis, has been associated with 10% more complications, including loss of erection). My sense is, the urologist will probably choose to let you finish puberty/developing first before he will entertain the option of corrective surgery. Jelqing and stretching techniques have not been shown to help, and may even be harmful. Hope this helps.
👍 198 | 👎 5
Did you like the answer? Penis is facing straight down? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Tissue case sewing

Lilac Originally Answered: Would u install a car seat rear facing on pass side or front facing in the middle (back seat)?
Rear facing is MUCH MUCH safe than forward facing, so she would actually be safer on one of the sides still rear facing. Rear facing offers a lot more protection. The old 20lbs/1 year rule is just that. OLD. It came about in the 1980's when our seats were only capable of rear facing to 20lbs and we didn't know any better. Now we definitely know better and all current convertible seats rear face to at least 30lbs, but its hard getting people to realize this. Turning kids forward at 20lbs/1year is an outdated practice that could cost you your child's life! 1)A forward-facing child under 2 years old is 5 times more likely to be killed or seriously injured in a crash than a rear-facing child of the same age. 2)A child's vertabrae do not fully fuse until 3-6 years old, before then, she is at great risk for internal decapitation. The spinal column can stretch up to 2 inches in a crash BUT the spinal cord can only stretch up to 1/4 inch before it snaps and baby is gone. 3)Current research suggests that children under the age of two years are 75 percent less likely to die or be seriously injured when they are riding rear facing. 4)In a recent article from Injury Prevention, it was found that the odds of severe injury to forward facing children age 12-23 months old was 5.32 times higher than a rear facing child. (Car Safety Seats For Children: Rear Facing For Best Protection; Injury Prevention 2007; 13:398-402.) It works this way: when you get in an accident and run into something, the car stop suddently, but everything and everyone in the car keeps moving in the direction the car was moving when it stopped, in most accidents, this is forward. So in an accident with a child in a forward facing seat, his head, the heaviest part of the body on babies and toddlers, flies forward very forcefully and easily snaps. If that same child is in a rear facing seat, his head tries to fly forward but is supported by the back of the rear facing seat, so there is no stress put on the child's neck and spine. Check out this photo album exclusively of rear facing kids, many of them much older than 12 months: http://www.cpsafety.com/articles/RFAlbum... There isn't a single documented case of a child breaking their legs b/c they were rear facing in an accident. There are, however, lots of cases where children have been killed and seriously injured where a rear facing seat would have protected them better. And most kids actually prefer to be rear facing b/c they can rest their feet on the vehicle seat back. When they are forward facing, their legs don't receive enough support and will frequently fall asleep. The outboard positions are not unsafe - just center is safest. But it is only safest if you get a good install there. If you really want her in the center, try out a different convertible seat that may fit right in between the 2 front seats. I can't find the exact link right now - but there is a thread on car-seat.org that talks about this exact issue -a nd the techs have agreed time and again that rear facing is always safest, no matter the position in the back. OH! Here one is: http://www.car-seat.org/showthread.php?t...
Lilac Originally Answered: Would u install a car seat rear facing on pass side or front facing in the middle (back seat)?
Hi, I have a rear facing car seat. I don't like having this seat in the back of the car because I can't see the baby! In my old car there were no air bags (it was a very old car! but fully insured with MOT just incase anyone was thinking of reporting me lol) so I could put the rear facing car seat in the front seat in that car. Now I have a new car I have a brand new car seat in the back, forward facing, so I can see my baby at all times. The passenger air bags can be switched off.
Lilac Originally Answered: Would u install a car seat rear facing on pass side or front facing in the middle (back seat)?
Great job keeping your child rearfacing!!!! My daughter rearfaced until last week at 3 1/2 years. She still wishes she could be RF, but she reached the weight limit. I would always choose RF over forward facing (FF). A RF outboard seat is much, much, much safer than a FF middle seat. My daughter rode RF in the center of my car, but outboard passenger side in my husband's car because I couldn't get a solid install in the center.

Justice Justice
As long as eveything is still working properly, I don't think there is anything to worry about. Consult a doctor if in doubt.
👍 80 | 👎 2

Justice Originally Answered: Could straight men and straight women agree with what attractive is for either sex?
Well, I think there are basically two kinds of "instruction sets" regarding beauty (cultural indoctrination could be a third one but its importance is relatively minor taking into account people from all over the world could agree regarding beauty despite cultural differences): A "universal" one, that deals with normal development and includes symmetry and the golden ratio (something that makes "ugliness" easy to spot since most people are symmetric) and a second one that deals with sexual specialization (regulating how attractive or not are the sexual characteristics of the opposite or same sex depending on the person's sexual orientation); this way, a straight man (or any woman) will pay importance to a woman's legs, breast, hips, etc besides the common stuff (ex. symmetry) while a gay guy won't consider any of equally relevant and will focus on different things. Now, regarding straight men and women's opinion about women, they will definitively agree since most women have a bisexual orientation and can be sexually attracted to both sexes (sexual attraction, IMO, relies on the dimorphic quality of sexual phenotype; ex. a hypothetical straight woman won't be attracted to a woman's legs or behind but a bi/lesbian woman will find them attractive on their own). So. I think people will agree on "universal beauty (or even better, lack of ugliness or defects) indicators" but they will pay different attention to sexual characteristics. IMO, sexual orientation determines a “target” or “special interest object” regarding visual scrutiny. Thus, a member of this target group will face “heavier” aesthetic qualifications. For good or bad, the judgment’s result will be amplified due to the biologically programmed importance and the subjective attractive nature of these “interesting” individuals. So, a straight man will consider an ugly woman disgusting while he plays little importance to an ugly guy’s appearance and will also consider a beautiful woman stunning while a “hot” guy will be just “meh”. And the opposite situation would be seen when considering a hypothetical straight woman (really straight and not bi/les with only certain heterosexual (or normative) tendencies). An example: Let’s pretend A represents a heterosexual group and B represents the opposite sex (and also its members). “A” will attribute certain visual attractiveness to other individuals and the result of its cognitive bias will be an amplification of any score given to B: [Cognitive bias, natural visual attraction or special interest: we’ll give it a X4 modifier since A is let’s say 80% straight individual] --(0 would represent no visual contact and 1, little to none special interest)-- When A looks at a “normal” A: 1, for a normal B: 4. (A considers B more aesthetically pleasant/attractive/interesting to look at). When A looks at an ugly A: -1, for an ugly B: -4. When A looks at a “hot” A: 2, for a “hot” B: 8. I guess you get the idea. [Obviously, these scores represent just an abstract idea.] After explaining my point, I will once again insist in the idea of women's lesbian leaning to justify why you can't compare amongst straight men and "straight" (lesbian leaning bisexual) women. By the way, I'm not saying this is the ultimate revelation but my personal conclusions. Cheers.
Justice Originally Answered: Could straight men and straight women agree with what attractive is for either sex?
Heterosexual males and females DO agree to a large degree what is attractive, regardless the sex of the attractive person. How do we know this? Because it is one of the major sources of jealousy and envy. For example, if I'm a plain-looking guy out with my girlfriend and (for example) Tom Cruise appears in our vicinity, I might have a visceral reaction and be somewhat fearful of losing my girlfriend to Tom Cruise right then and there. I might grab her hand or put my arm around her, subconsciously demonstrating some level of possession! Of course, it doesn't even have to be a celebrity, but any attractive male (or at least one I believe my girlfriend would think is attractive). While beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder, that doesn't mean there is NOT a lot of commonality of physical traits regarded are attractive within a culture, or indeed within the whole human species. There is! However, as a heterosexual male, my recognition that some other male is attractive (or very likely attractive) in no way means that I'm attracted to him. And, although some heterosexual males (or females) may want to be in the company of attractive people of the same sex, it (by definition) would NOT mean they are attracted to them for sexual reasons, but most likely are attracted to them for social enhancement reasons.

If you have your own answer to the question tissue case sewing, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.