3284 Shares

What makes Jerusalem 'your city?'?

What makes Jerusalem 'your city?'? Topic: personal statement criteria
July 20, 2019 / By Tucker
Question: A (Jewish) user here used the phrase: “Jerusalem OUR city,” which got me thinking of what exactly does that mean. I’m taking about the metaphysics of the statement. This statement was uttered in a context of exclusion - it’s exclusively ‘our city’ and everyone else’s claims or attachment to the city are less or null. What exactly makes a city one’s own? - Is it where one is born? Is it where one’s parents are born? - Is it where one’s ancestors were born? How back can one go with ancestry? (What if your ancestors were born in various places?) (What if one is a convert to Judaism and has no link with ancestry, does that mean the city does not belong to him/her?) - Is it based of rule - who has ruled/cared for it the longest? - Is it because the city is gifted exclusively to you by a deity? (In this, take into account the fallacy of circular reasoning) - Is it because one loves it the most? (‘Next time in Jerusalem’) - Is it based on a moral right? (meaning, one deserves the city because one’s rule has shown to be morally superior than other rules of the city throughout history) Note, I’m not denying or affirming this statement. I want to know what criterion is used. Also, please ignore all typos... @Losha: please point to where I declared Jerusalem was 'my' city -_- You do not understand my question at all. While you are at it, please refer back to the points and answer the question again. Jerusalem and the land is mentioned over 70 times, explicitly and implicitly, in Islamic scriptures of Qur'an and ahadith, but if number-counting is your thing, whatever - refer back to circular reasoning. As two people have brought it up, for the record: I do not hold Mecca either to be 'my' city. The concept is very foreign to me. In fact, there is a saying in Mecca: "only the people of Mecca are familiar with their mountain trails" and I do not fall in the category of "the people of Mecca" so it's not 'my' city. @Mr Z: Your comment is vague. What do you mean by “denying?” Denying existence in the city? Ownership? Jewish links/claims? I do not think this question was about denying. In addition, your comparison with Mecca is comparing apples to oranges. Jerusalem has always been of plurality of religions and peoples. Whereas, Mecca was a homogeneous arid land lacking resources and any plurality or diversity, similar to the Germanic tribes. Unlike their Byzantine or Persian neighbors, so, your comparison is weak. [Source: Berkey, Religion and Society in the Near East]. @Mr Z, [1]: http://logical-critical-thinking.com/logical-fallacy/red-herring-fallacy/ [2]: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adhomine.html [3]: http://nichcy.org/5readingcompstrats
Best Answer

Best Answers: What makes Jerusalem 'your city?'?

Rhett Rhett | 7 days ago
If I had to guess i would say that he/she as a Jew is proud to live in the city of their ancestors as you say and if you know the history behind it all then i can understand it. I believe that Jerusalem is a part of his Historical and Religious identity and that makes him possessive and it would insult his beliefs if a non-believer would claim it as theirs, hence their history. Concerning what makes a city yours I can say from personal experience that it all depends on the person. I come from South Africa and I am a white man. Even today there are Africans who believe that Europeans should get out of South Africa, though they are in the minority, even though i was born and raised here apparently my motherland is not mine. Then I met a vet who came from America to Botswana and he believes that he is as African as the soil. So I would say that it all depends on where you find your identity. Hope this helped
👍 162 | 👎 7
Did you like the answer? What makes Jerusalem 'your city?'? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: personal statement criteria


Rhett Originally Answered: Why would Jesus be buried in Jerusalem when?
He was buried there alright, Matthew. Mark, Luke and John all testify of his death and resurrection. You make a good point about his following all the laws. But the simple truth is we just at this time do not know about some parts of his life like if he was married or not. However we do know his body is not in that tomb or any tomb.

Melvyn Melvyn
As you already know ^ Nicolas is a Christian, not a "scholar of Islam." Possibly equally offended by the statement ;o) (But he is right on this one). It is based on the exclusivity of their doctrine. The very aspect of chosenness implies a special status, a special role in the world, and everyone else to have walk-on parts. The Christian doctrine of vicarious atonement and the economy of salvation also implies a rejectionist view. Muslims accept all Jewish prophets and accept Jesus, honours both their lineages, and sees them both as People of the Book, and there is a scriptural basis for their protection. Muslims have ruled and protected Jerusalem far longer than the Israelis and more worthy of a rule. It was the only rule in which there was no bloodshed in its conquest. So, I find the statement absurd. It seems to be a zealous clenching of the fist, so to speak. ~
👍 60 | 👎 4

Jona Jona
Because it is the capital of Israel, our country. But above all it's because Jerusalem is the holiest city for Jews. We have as much right to Jerusalem as Muslims do to Mecca. Losha has a good point. Jerusalem is mentioned hundreds of times in our religious books, but zero times in the Quran. And Simple Simon also has a good point.. it's called JEWrusalem. Muslims are welcome to live in the city but our city certainly doesn't belong to them. Israel are the ones who maintain the city and keep everything in perfect condition. Before the Zionist Movement Jerusalem was a poorly maintained city of just 20,000. Israel spends billions on maintaining Jerusalem while the Arabs never lifted a finger. We call it "Yerushalayim", as did the Israelites. Christians call it "Jerusalem", a deviation rooted from the Israelite name. Muslims call it "Al-Quds", a name unrelated to any of Jerusalem's history. Jerusalem isn't really a holy city for Muslims. Jerusalem is holy to Christians and Jews who believe in the Biblical texts that circulate around Jerusalem, while the Muslims believe in the Quran which fails to mention Jerusalem even once.
👍 54 | 👎 1

Haggi Haggi
Your questions are very pointed and considerate. However, regarding Jerusalem there are different scales. Jerusalem has been a center of civil and religious developments for several thousand years. Historically, it was conquered and settled by Assyrians, Judaic tribes, by Romans, by Arabic tribes, by Christians, by Moslems, by Turks and others, until the land around was in the 20th century allocated arbitrarily for a "re-settlement" of Jews from all over the world. Since three major religions have their roots there, it really is not anybody's city, but a commonwealth. The person you are referring to is ignoring all the very special peculiarities and just uttered his narrow minded chauvinistic opinion. There cannot be a claim by Jews that Jerusalem is alone their city. @Aлиса May Allah bless you in your innocence. I am a recognized and extremely objective Scholar of Islam, indeed. Inshallah Dr. El Hakim Bin Nimsa Al-Faruq مفتي
👍 48 | 👎 -2

Eason Eason
Jerusalem is the Holy land for Muslims,Christians, and Jews. Hence where i put Jews at>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
👍 42 | 👎 -5

Caden Caden
Jerusalem should remain a Jewish city and an Israeli territory. There are religious, historical, and moral reasons for this. Denying Jews Jerusalem, its equivalent to denying Muslims Mecca. edit. Palestian Authority wants ALL JEWS OUT OF "Palestinian territories" in any peace agreement. If it goes their way, east Jerusalem will be Jew-free. Isn't this ethnic cleaning? Jews built Jerusalem, making it their city. You seem like a smug college kid(who is trying to look smart by citing sources), and I would easily win debates with you on this topic all day long.
👍 36 | 👎 -8

Caden Originally Answered: Question about New Jerusalem from Revelations in the Bible?
You will have to wait for Jesus to answer this question for you . He might have shown someone already that you have not met yet. It could be that Jesus has not shown anyone the reason for this, yet. However, Jesus heard your question and if you want the correct answer you have to wait on Him to answer it for you if you want the truth. I have waited long periods of time for answers to questions I had about what I read in the Bible, but when the timing was the right time Jesus revealed the answers to me either personally or through someone else. For example I wanted to know for almost 16 years who the king of the North is in Dan 11, because that is the country that antichrist seizes control of. Then one day while I was visiting a church, when the Pastor of that church began telling me that I should read William Branham's autobiography, the Holy Spirit enlightened that I should read his books. I found the answer to the question in a vision that he saw, but did not understand, which is Russia. The second part of you question I can shed some light on. The present heaven and earth are destroyed after the 1000 years, which means that New Jerusalem does not come to rest on this earth. Rev. 20:7   When the thousand years are completed, Satan will be released from his prison, 8 and will come out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together for the war; the number of them is like the sand of the seashore. 9 And they came up on the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city, and fire came down from heaven and devoured them. 10 And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are also; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever. After the 1000 years the a new heaven and a new earth come down out of heave in which is the New Jerusalem. Rev. 21:1   Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea. 2 And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself will be among them, 4 and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away.” 5   And He who sits on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” And He *said, “Write, for these words are faithful and true.” James D Albright

If you have your own answer to the question personal statement criteria, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.